Happened again tonight, the watch folder has no image there after the watch folder process moved it to watchcmdupload even though it failed.martin@rootjazz wrote:Fixed this so it will be in the next update
LOG ID: 25844
Happened again tonight, the watch folder has no image there after the watch folder process moved it to watchcmdupload even though it failed.martin@rootjazz wrote:Fixed this so it will be in the next update
That is correct (insofar as that is what it is supposed to do by design - whether it should or not can be argued). The image is detected in the watch folder, an action is created to upload the image. The image is moved to a watchwaiting folder so it will not be picked up on another loop of the watch.the watch folder has no image there after the watch folder process moved it to watchcmdupload even though it failed.
.. but if TJ fails to post it, then shouldn't it put the image back where it got it from, otherwise you're losing content you've spent time collecting/creating, as it is, it disappears into a void actually created by TJ, never to be seen again.martin@rootjazz wrote:
That is correct (insofar as that is what it is supposed to do by design - whether it should or not can be argued). The image is detected in the watch folder, an action is created to upload the image. The image is moved to a watchwaiting folder so it will not be picked up on another loop of the watch.the watch folder has no image there after the watch folder process moved it to watchcmdupload even though it failed.
I understand your reasoning. The issue is, the post image action, doesn't know what created it (whether watch folder or a manually created upload routine). It just has a list of file paths and parameters for it to upload.maVen wrote:.. but if TJ fails to post it, then shouldn't it put the image back where it got it from, otherwise you're losing content you've spent time collecting/creating, as it is, it disappears into a void actually created by TJ, never to be seen again.martin@rootjazz wrote:
That is correct (insofar as that is what it is supposed to do by design - whether it should or not can be argued). The image is detected in the watch folder, an action is created to upload the image. The image is moved to a watchwaiting folder so it will not be picked up on another loop of the watch.the watch folder has no image there after the watch folder process moved it to watchcmdupload even though it failed.
It must put it back, it's the proper course of action - can you do this please.