Not Ask Enabled
Not Ask Enabled
I noticed for TJ Ask feature the app pauses for URLs that don't have ask enabled. It would keep pausing for these same URLs on every run, instead of instantly skipping in the beginning like the already asked URLs. The runs will take longer as these "not ask enabled" URLs accumulate..
- martin@rootjazz
- Site Admin
- Posts: 34803
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
- Location: The Funk
- Contact:
Re: Not Ask Enabled
there is no pause in the code.
If you feed in the same file, with the same URLs, then yes each URL will be rechecked everytime it is asked. The "pause" you are referring to, is the HTTP call to check if the blog is asked enabledIt would keep pausing for these same URLs on every run
Re: Not Ask Enabled
Can those URLs that disabled asked be skipped then? because the runs will take longer as these URLs accumulate.If you feed in the same file, with the same URLs, then yes each URL will be rechecked everytime it is asked. The "pause" you are referring to, is the HTTP call to check if the blog is asked enabled
Also this is off topic, but the gplus update from yesterday isn't downloading new version. I sent email about it yesterday.
- martin@rootjazz
- Site Admin
- Posts: 34803
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
- Location: The Funk
- Contact:
Re: Not Ask Enabled
I am not with you. If you check a list that containsMoses wrote:Can those URLs that disabled asked be skipped then? because the runs will take longer as these URLs accumulate.If you feed in the same file, with the same URLs, then yes each URL will be rechecked everytime it is asked. The "pause" you are referring to, is the HTTP call to check if the blog is asked enabled
url1
url2
url3
the first time you run it. url 1 fails as not enabled and 2 and 3 pass
The 2nd time you run the same file, you want to skip url1? But perhaps url is enabled now?
At any rate, I think it is correct to check the file as passed in.
But perhaps I have misunderstood