Block feature adjustments

Support / help / discussion forum for twitter bot
User avatar
martin@rootjazz
Site Admin
Posts: 34696
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
Location: The Funk
Contact:

Re: Block feature adjustments

Post by martin@rootjazz »

Bri wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:09 am
When I use the left side. For non active. It doesn't bring anything up. I will do another process and provide information and logs soon
LEt me know logs and I can check what is going on.

But do make sure you are on the latest version:

https://rootjazz.com/twitterdub/updatetesting.html

As issues have been fixed in recent updates
User avatar
martin@rootjazz
Site Admin
Posts: 34696
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
Location: The Funk
Contact:

Re: Block feature adjustments

Post by martin@rootjazz »

Bri wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 3:20 pm Here is my logs: 43276

version 3.1.1.264
scraper tab
max results 50000
scrape profiles - enter a username
USER FILTER - Days since last active 200/0 URLs
hit scrape profiles

let me know what I am doing wrong, please.

thanks, bud
you posted this after I read the thread. Will check through
Bri
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:53 am

Re: Block feature adjustments

Post by Bri »

I live for the latest version :lol: :lol: :lol:

My bots are set to 'auto check' :P

I update even if I don't need the new edits lol
Bri
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:53 am

Re: Block feature adjustments

Post by Bri »

Any update bud?
User avatar
martin@rootjazz
Site Admin
Posts: 34696
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
Location: The Funk
Contact:

Re: Block feature adjustments

Post by martin@rootjazz »

Bri wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 4:47 pmAny update bud?
Please be aware on weekends. Yesterday was Sunday and Monday is a catch up of weekend support - especially investigative issues


16:15:07: Days since last like: jakehardy25: 0.319831820689815
16:15:07: * FAILED check active: lastActive: 200 > 0 < 0
So your filter is set to INCLUDE users who were last active OVER 200 days ago. This user was active 0.3 days ago (0) so was ignored

From your posted logs:
* FAILED check active: lastActive: 365 > 0 < 0
* IGNORE: active date
include if last post older than 365, this user posted 0 days ago so was ignored.

Everything looks like it is working


As for pinned tweets effecting feed, can you send me a profile that has an old pinned tweet
Bri
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:53 am

Re: Block feature adjustments

Post by Bri »

As for pinned tweets effecting feed, can you send me a profile that has an old pinned tweet
https://mobile.twitter.com/CharliyBundy
User avatar
martin@rootjazz
Site Admin
Posts: 34696
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
Location: The Funk
Contact:

Re: Block feature adjustments

Post by martin@rootjazz »

Bri wrote: Tue Apr 21, 2020 10:13 pm
As for pinned tweets effecting feed, can you send me a profile that has an old pinned tweet
https://mobile.twitter.com/CharliyBundy
Run a SCRAPER action to get LATEST TWEET or USER TWEETS(1) and you do NOT get the pinned tweet.

The pinned tweets are NOT returned in the userfeed



Regards,
Martin
Bri
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:53 am

Re: Block feature adjustments

Post by Bri »

The pinned tweets are NOT returned in the userfeed
Ok thanks
User avatar
martin@rootjazz
Site Admin
Posts: 34696
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
Location: The Funk
Contact:

Re: Block feature adjustments

Post by martin@rootjazz »

:)
Bri
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:53 am

Re: Block feature adjustments

Post by Bri »

Hi, bud,

I told you something wasn't right when I chose to use the right-hand side number (people who ARE active)

but when I use the left side, (to find inactive) it completes in seconds, and returned 0 results, here are the logs: 73668

I've included some screenshots, hopefully they're in the lots folder. I put them in the logs folder before I hit submit logs.



ps, when I use the right side, for (active) accounts, it works fine, it took 3 hours and returned 1000 results (which is what I asked for)

thanks, Martin, hope you can fix this soon :D
Post Reply