low urgency: contradicting information concerning max amount of processors for an action limited to 1
- martin@rootjazz
- Site Admin
- Posts: 34706
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
- Location: The Funk
- Contact:
Re: low urgency: contradicting information concerning max amount of processors for an action limited to 1
I noticed this still wasn't fixed. It's an EXTREME emergency now ;-P
PS: it once i a while looks like you fix something and then for the next round of improvements, you grab an older version of the source code, losing progress you made... Can that be true? : ) I understand version checking is a real pita.
PS: it once i a while looks like you fix something and then for the next round of improvements, you grab an older version of the source code, losing progress you made... Can that be true? : ) I understand version checking is a real pita.
- martin@rootjazz
- Site Admin
- Posts: 34706
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
- Location: The Funk
- Contact:
Re: low urgency: contradicting information concerning max amount of processors for an action limited to 1
no, not possible (working on old code)bitcoin wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2017 1:52 am I noticed this still wasn't fixed. It's an EXTREME emergency now ;-P
PS: it once i a while looks like you fix something and then for the next round of improvements, you grab an older version of the source code, losing progress you made... Can that be true? : ) I understand version checking is a real pita.
will check single account processing
- martin@rootjazz
- Site Admin
- Posts: 34706
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
- Location: The Funk
- Contact:
Re: low urgency: contradicting information concerning max amount of processors for an action limited to 1
open app
single account processing OFF
create 3 actions with a single account
threads = 3
click RUN
all three run.
turn single account on
save
restart
check settings tab: single account ON
3 actions in processor (one account)
threads = 3
click RUN
1 action runs.
working for me
single account processing OFF
create 3 actions with a single account
threads = 3
click RUN
all three run.
turn single account on
save
restart
check settings tab: single account ON
3 actions in processor (one account)
threads = 3
click RUN
1 action runs.
working for me
Re: low urgency: contradicting information concerning max amount of processors for an action limited to 1
I'm not saying it doesn't work, I'm saying the GUI gives the wrong status for that option...
- martin@rootjazz
- Site Admin
- Posts: 34706
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
- Location: The Funk
- Contact:
Re: low urgency: contradicting information concerning max amount of processors for an action limited to 1
Then I don't understand. When I loaded the app, the GUI option was checked and the results were correct. When unchecked, again the correct processing happened
Can you explain what you mean "gui gives wrong status"
Where?
What does it say?
Re: low urgency: contradicting information concerning max amount of processors for an action limited to 1
Well I'll be ***... I saw it again in the Processors Tab but now... It's gone! I don't know... I'll keep an eye out and until I see it again... sorry?
- martin@rootjazz
- Site Admin
- Posts: 34706
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
- Location: The Funk
- Contact:
Re: low urgency: contradicting information concerning max amount of processors for an action limited to 1
are you referring to the text instruction label on the processing tab! I think you are. Will check
- martin@rootjazz
- Site Admin
- Posts: 34706
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
- Location: The Funk
- Contact:
Re: low urgency: contradicting information concerning max amount of processors for an action limited to 1
ok there were some work flows that would cause the label to be wrong. Fixed for next update
Regards,
Martin
Regards,
Martin