Object reference not set to an instance of an object (URGENT HELP)

[leon]

Hey,

Get this when sending Direct Message:

ERROR RESP FROM TWITTER: 17 No user matches for specified terms.
* WARNING: Request failed with Twitter response: No user matches for specified terms.
WARNING should process error: The Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

Best Regards

[leon]

Getting an Error by Submittng logs.

[martin@rootjazz]

Goto the directory:
%appdata%\rootjazz\twitterdub\

then zip up the logs folder (right click > send to > zip)
(or ideally just the last 24 hours worth of logs)



If the file is less than 8mb, email it to me:

Code: Select all

support[at]rootjazz[dot]com

Otherwise upload somewhere and send me the link



Regards,
Martin

[leon]

LOG ID: 21688

[martin@rootjazz]

Logs don't contain the start of the action.

What search are you running?

Seems the SEARCH is returning IDs, but when it comes time to DM the ID, the program has to convert the ID to user_details, but twitter returns the ID does not exist.

Are you using a SEARCH or are you passing in a pre-prepared list?


As to the logging, that can be tidied up. The question is, why is the program trying to process IDs of profiles taht do not exist, where did they come from?

[leon]

Using pre-prepared followers list.
So better to Scrape URLs or Details?

[martin@rootjazz]

And if you could

Please perform:

1) Clear logs: HELP > LOGS > DELETE
2) Run the action that you are having an issue with.

***
DO NOT RUN ANY OTHER ACTIONS AT THE SAME TIME
***
Run the most simple version of the DM action to cause the issue, as soon as it is caused, submit logs

3) If the issue happens again, submit logs:
HELP > LOGS > SUBMIT

then send your logs ID - the first 4 numbers is sufficient (displayed after successful uploading of logs)





Regards,
Martin

[leon]

I did already

[leon]

LOG ID: 96318

[martin@rootjazz]

Using pre-prepared followers list.

well twitter is returning the accounts no longer exist.

Either that is correct and the accounts are banned. Or something is wrong.

Is it better to scrape URLs? Actually no, IDs are best, but we cannot manually confirm if it is a valid ID, like we can with an URL by just viewing it in the browser.

How old is this file? Could it be you scraped a load of faked accounts (if you scrape followers of an account that just purchased 10k followers, then yes, it could be you have a file full of now-banned accounts