Request for Feedback. Managing bulk accounts

Ask any support / help / issues / problem or question related to TumblingJazz
User avatar
martin@rootjazz
Site Admin
Posts: 34360
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
Location: The Funk
Contact:

Re: Request for Feedback. Managing bulk accounts

Post by martin@rootjazz »

janojebo wrote:Possible to add share across account function to post images from rss module?
all actions have the option of being single account or shared by default
User avatar
martin@rootjazz
Site Admin
Posts: 34360
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
Location: The Funk
Contact:

Re: Request for Feedback. Managing bulk accounts

Post by martin@rootjazz »

I just had a read of the other thread, but still cannot think of a way to make it easy to do

perhaps a little scripting language would be useful, then it is easy:

Code: Select all

accounts = get_accounts_with_tag("sport")
counter = 0
while(true){
   acc = accounts[counter]
   tmp_index = counter++
   if tmp_index>= len(accounts): tmp_index = 0
   set_token("#mapped_acc#", accounts[tmp_index].get_profile_url())
}
   

so you get the accounts to use, you then loop through them, mapping the account to the next account in the list


then when you want to run the mass action you would use the token in the search box

#mapped_acc#
as each account has that token pointing to a different account it would do what you want.


The problem with this approach is, I would basically have to code things for everyone who wanted something custom (how is often the case with RSS feeds now, and that is just xpath and a lot simpler than a script language access to the data
janojebo
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Request for Feedback. Managing bulk accounts

Post by janojebo »

martin@rootjazz wrote:
all actions have the option of being single account or shared by default
Image


i dont have share across accounts checkbox there
User avatar
martin@rootjazz
Site Admin
Posts: 34360
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
Location: The Funk
Contact:

Re: Request for Feedback. Managing bulk accounts

Post by martin@rootjazz »

janojebo wrote:
martin@rootjazz wrote:
all actions *SHOULD* have the option of being single account or shared by default
Image


i dont have share across accounts checkbox there
*ahem* quite right, it *should* be there but isn't.

Send me a reminder next week and I'll look into it
janojebo
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Request for Feedback. Managing bulk accounts

Post by janojebo »

martin@rootjazz wrote:
janojebo wrote:
martin@rootjazz wrote:
all actions *SHOULD* have the option of being single account or shared by default
Image


i dont have share across accounts checkbox there
*ahem* quite right, it *should* be there but isn't.

Send me a reminder next week and I'll look into it
Remider
User avatar
martin@rootjazz
Site Admin
Posts: 34360
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
Location: The Funk
Contact:

Re: Request for Feedback. Managing bulk accounts

Post by martin@rootjazz »

going have to bump all new features back to next week. got some things I really must focus on this week and they are already very late.

Sorry, remind me next week
janojebo
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Request for Feedback. Managing bulk accounts

Post by janojebo »

Reminder 2.0

Small request
In post image module Load From Descs FIle the separator is % and sometimes i use % in the text like % off or so, nice would be to change it to less used character
User avatar
martin@rootjazz
Site Admin
Posts: 34360
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
Location: The Funk
Contact:

Re: Request for Feedback. Managing bulk accounts

Post by martin@rootjazz »

janojebo wrote:Reminder 2.0

Small request
In post image module Load From Descs FIle the separator is % and sometimes i use % in the text like % off or so, nice would be to change it to less used character

The curse of the badly chosen separator strikes again!

I'll change it to tab separated. If you don't get an update soon, remind me.

Code: Select all

support[at]rootjazz[dot]com
User avatar
martin@rootjazz
Site Admin
Posts: 34360
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:06 pm
Location: The Funk
Contact:

Re: Request for Feedback. Managing bulk accounts

Post by martin@rootjazz »

tab will be used if there are more tabs than %.

So if your description is
Great %%%%%%% savings for you %%%%%%
well that just isn't going to work.


but if you do

Code: Select all

title      my high saving% desc       stub       tags     src
then you are good from next update :)
theone
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 4:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Request for Feedback. Managing bulk accounts

Post by theone »

martin@rootjazz wrote: Sun Apr 23, 2017 11:19 pm Also am thinking about offering a cloud based system. It would remove the issue of memory limits, slow downs of running 1000k, 10,000 accounts. No need to run 1 or multiple VPS systems, no having to run the program for the actions to work - and no having to try and debug random user machine specific issues, or trying to figure out something that doesn't make sense to realise someone is running an old version.

Although whether people like server apps or prefer desktop I am not sure. Some do, some don't obviously and it is a trust issue as well as I could spy on campaigns, targeted keywords to steal your accounts, update passwords and keep them. But I hope the last few years of business would allay those fears, but.... But you have to trust someone at the end of the day. The workers on minimum wage at your VPS host, can log in and see what you are doing and steal /copy as well.

Perhaps an ideal way to offer both, run local, run on cloud... but is a big duplication....
Hey Martin,
Is this still being considered as an option? A cloud based option would be pretty sweet the more I think about it. As it is now, I have multiple instances of tjazz running on 2 different PC's so every time I do a restart I need to start the bot and all the instances which isn't huge pain but it could be avoided with a cloud based solution. Plus Avast really hates Tumbling Jazz and blocks it at every startup and update. That part can be a pain so if it could be eliminated, that would rock.

As far as trust goes, hell, I've trusted people much shadier than you without any issues so I see no reason not to trust you. I'd be willing to pay extra to upgrade to a cloud based system and see no problem with having a yearly subscription fee to cover ongoing upgrades and expenses.
Post Reply