Rootjazz

are your search inputs very similar? It seems you are losing items due to duplicate results. i.e. if you search for: basketball nba nbabasketball etc, then alot of the results for different searches will be the same, seems that is what happening. Looking into ways to void that now, but more varied ...

And here is another account ********* Processed: 215/340 Failed: 0 ********* Started: 10/11/2017 21:49 PM Finished: 11/11/2017 07:44 AM Actually who knows how long it is has been doing this. I just had to look into, because I had a client complain it wasn't hitting the numbers he expected.. Logs: 27...

Logs: 43804

This is actually a different account

martin@rootjazz wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 4:01 pm https://rootjazz.com/twitterdub/updatetesting.html

sorry, I've confirmed this is working

Still not following the max number. -briefly checked it before work

I'll post logs this evening

Put 'Reload Settings' in the Promo Module.

Instead of having to rebuild it when you change or add, similiar to Instadub.

martin@rootjazz wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 10:43 pm https://rootjazz.com/twitterdub/updatetesting.html


please try this and see if it makes a difference. If not, submit logs

Doesn't open after the update

https://rootjazz.com/twitterdub/updatetesting.html please try this, run the action, if same issue, submit logs HELP > LOGS > SUBMIT then send your logs ID - the first 4 numbers is sufficient (displayed after successful uploading of logs) ********* Processed: 202/340 Failed: 1 ********* Logs: 52552

The next day, I'm still not maxing out my limits.

202 today...

Logs: 58227

Why is that TwitterDub gives me these results with Promo?

*********
Processed: 187/340
Failed: 0
*********

Why isn't 340/340 if one of the criteria has 10K followers to follow? Same account as in this thread.

Logs: 63770

found your issue. The program couldn't find enough users from teh main searches, so tried a more complex custom search to get results related to your inputs, one of those was not stepped out of when it hit your wanted number of results and tried to check all possible results from the call (5000) wh...