Suggestions / feature requests / improvements

[kavram]

yes you got it right .
only after changing the background of the images it should be unique . then it will convert it to video .
if you can let me know the price

[kavram]

and approximately how long does it take

[martin@rootjazz]

yes you got it right .
only after changing the background of the images it should be unique . then it will convert it to video .
if you can let me know the price

All images and videos posted are passed through a unique function, so they will all have a different hash and are unique on a programatic level (although on an AI check, they may fail - but there is no evidence twitter uses AI to look for uniqueness.

If an AI is used to check for uniqueness, a simple border is not going to pass either, it would only pass a md5 / crc of the image check - which is not an issue anyway

So you can use the:

Image Tab: Convert to Video
or
Video tab:Image to video (with custom font and text overlay)



Unless you really really want this custom border update, then please confirm and we can discuss that further, but there really isn't much point IMO



Regards,
Martin

[kavram]

I will try what you said.
I will inform you
thanks martin

[martin@rootjazz]

I will try what you said.
I will inform you
thanks martin

Just a few more details. What TD does is a byte level manipulation of the image / video. So they are not, on a code level the same image (which is the most often check performed on a a file (any file, image / video but works for all files). They will take a CRC (sometimes called MD5) of the file and get a value, that "should" be unique to that file, then it just matches if that CRC value matches anything else. With TD, this is unique, even though the images may "look" to the eye identical, on a code level they are not.



Regards,
Martin

[Leo]

[feature requests]
I would like a feature to periodically handle bulk JSON cookies.

There is an issue where I am logged out of Twitter for some reason. When I try to log back in using dub, it sometimes fails, possibly due to a proxy issue. Therefore, I log back in through another method and extract the cookies again. I then load these cookies into dub.

To reduce this kind of work, it would be helpful if bulk JSON cookies could operate automatically at regular intervals. Even as an optional feature, it would be appreciated. It would be great if it could read from a specified folder at specified time intervals.

[User Operations]
Specify a folder containing cookies.
Set a timer.
Specify the target account for cookie loading.
An option to remove local blocks simultaneously when loading cookies is desired (a checkbox, etc., is acceptable).
Create the process.

[Process Operation]
Load cookies based on the specified timer.
Remove local blocks based on the option.

[Remarks]
It is acceptable for this action to operate separately from other actions.


Is it possible to implement this kind of functionality?

[martin@rootjazz]

[User Operations]
Specify a folder containing cookies.

I assume one file per account and the file name is

<username>.txt

where <username> is the actual username of the account to map?

Create the process.

Do you want to see this action in the processor? Or just have it happen in the background?

Is it possible to implement this kind of functionality?

Anything is possible Whether it gets implemented depends on demand / how much time I have / or if you just pay for it (in which case I can do it today /tomorrow)


--------------------------------
standard reply for suggestions:
--------------------------------
The suggestion has been noted and added to the feature suggestions list. Depending on the demand for the change / feature will alter how quickly it gets implemented.

As others have asked for the option to prioritise their feature, I'm just letting you know (it's by no means compulsory) if the feature is very important to you, we do offer the chance to sponsor the feature to get it developed ASAP. If interested write in with your budget (it's simple, the more you pay bigger the priority will be for further discussion: support[at]rootjazz[dot]com





Regards,
Martin

[Leo]

I assume one file per account and the file name is

<username>.txt
where <username> is the actual username of the account to map?

Yes.

Do you want to see this action in the processor? Or just have it happen in the background?

If possible, a process is good. It's better to be able to confirm it.

I'd be happy if it were possible to operate it on a trial basis.
And if there are no problems, I'd be happy to charge for it.

[martin@rootjazz]

I'd be happy if it were possible to operate it on a trial basis.
And if there are no problems, I'd be happy to charge for it.

and that is ultimately the issue. You have an idea that you think might work. If it does work, you're happy to pay. But regardless I still need to do the extra work on your assumption it may (but equally might not) do what you want.

Without an upfront payment to get something developed right away, the suggestion goes on the "suggested features" pile, please read the standard reply above for how that works.



Regards,
Martin

[Gabe335]

Hello Martin

Hope you are well.

Question the button to appeal suspended accounts is not there anymore in version 3.6.8.1 was it moved to another area? can't seem to find it or was it removed completely. This was very helpful when we had many suspended accounts hopefully it can be placed back.

please advise thank you in advance